April’s Washington Update

April 18, 2017                                                                  Volume 23, No. 4


The Government Relations staff is still looking for stories about problems that our members have experienced during air travel. Please visit www.AirAccess30.org and share your story.

House VA Health Subcommittee Considers Pending Legislation

On March 29, 2017, the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Subcommittee on Health, held a hearing on pending legislation. Sarah Dean, Associate Legislative Director, testified on behalf of PVA. This testimony was Sarah’s first opportunity to testify before Congress.

Of particular importance to PVA was H.R. 95, the “Veterans’ Access to Child Care Act.” This legislation, introduced by Rep. Julia Brownley (D-CA), would make permanent the provision of child care for a veteran receiving covered health services at VA. PVA knows child-care is critical to expanding access to care. When veterans have reliable child care their participation in their own health increases, no-shows and cancelations decrease. Women veterans particularly report the inability to obtain child-care as one of their greatest barriers to VA.

PVA also supported H.R. 907, the “Newborn Improvement Act,” introduced by Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA). This bill would authorize hospital stays of up to 42 days for newborns under VA care. Currently, only seven days after birth is covered, after which the veteran takes on the cost. As the average hospital stay for a health newborn is two day, any newborn needing additional coverage is likely to be facing serious complications. PVA is specifically concerned about veterans with catastrophic injuries that can cause or exacerbate high-risk pregnancies or pre-term deliveries. A seven day limit arguably impacts veterans with disabilities at a greater rate than other veterans.

PVA also offered support for H.R. 1545, the “VA Prescription Data Accountability Act of 2017,” introduced by Rep. Ann Kuster (D-NH). All VA facilities now share prescription information of veterans and their dependents with state Prescription Database Monitoring Program (PDMP). However, due to technical oversight in the law the information of non-dependent, non-veteran, VA beneficiaries is not shared. This bill would rectify the flaw. While PVA strongly supports the bill, we expressed concern that the PDMPs may not be capturing those veterans who travel across multiple states to receive care from the SCI/D Centers. PVA encouraged Congress to ensure state PDMPs are able to share information across multiple state lines to offer all veterans the benefits that will come from these opioid safety measures.

All of the bills considered in this hearing were later passed by the subcommittee and sent to the full committee for consideration.

To read PVA’s full written testimony, please visit www.pva.org.

House VA Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Holds Legislative Hearing

On April 5, 2017, the House Veterans Affairs’ Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs held a legislative hearing to consider a number of bills. Among them were two provisions affecting the annual cost-of-living allowance (COLA). PVA supported both measures. The first bill would authorize a cost of living adjustment effective December 1, 2017 equal to the percentage increase implemented by Social Security. The second provision being considered would make the annual adjustment automatic, not requiring Congressional action. Historically, the annual COLA bill has been important legislation that must pass each year. During times of particularly contentious relations in Congress, this legislation has been used as a vehicle to pass other important veterans legislation. While we have voiced this concern in the past, PVA did not object to making the COLA adjustment automatic going forward, as it would add a level of certainty for veterans expecting annual increases.

PVA also supported Ranking Member Tim Walz’s (D-MN) legislation which would prevent VA from demanding redundant compensation and pension (C&P) exams when veterans provide private medical evidence. While VA has the legal authority to rely on private medical evidence, too often it seems that VA requires a second medical exam from the veteran with a VA doctor despite having quality evidence already in hand. The pattern suggests a prejudice toward private medical evidence and the possibility that VA is seeking further evidence solely to avoid granting a claim.

Rep. Brownley (D-CA) offered a bill, H.R. 105 that would add greater protections to veterans who are fraudulently deprived of benefits being administered by a fiduciary. Currently, VA may only reissue lost benefits to veterans who are harmed by fiduciaries who administer benefits to more than ten veterans or if the fiduciary is an institution. If the veteran is not served by a qualifying fiduciary, VA can only reissue benefits to the extent that it recoups money from the bad actor. PVA supported this measure because it would allow VA to reissue benefits under all circumstances, regardless of whether it recoups the funds.

PVA also continues to support a service-connected presumption for Blue Water Navy Veterans who are claiming exposure to herbicides containing dioxin, including Agent Orange. We stressed that as more evidence and information becomes available on the connection that Congress take appropriate steps to ensure these veterans receive the appropriate care and compensation.

Finally, PVA supported H.R. 1390. Currently, VA is only authorized to transport veterans’ remains to the nearest national cemetery with available burial space. This proposal, though, would extend the options to state and tribal cemeteries. It would limit, however, the amount of reimbursement to the cost of the nearest national cemetery so as not to increase the financial burden on VA.

To view PVA’s full statement, please visit www.pva.org.

Congress Passes Choice Program Extension

With the Choice program set to expire on August 7, 2017, Congress recently passed a law eliminating the mandatory expiration date for the program, allowing it to continue to deliver health care services to veterans in the community and use up the remaining funds in the program. Without the extension, the projected remaining funds would be returned to the Treasury. This extension now provides extra time for Congress to address the shortfalls of the current program and move toward a wider and more permanent health care reform in VA. The bill now awaits the President’s signature.

Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Leadership Holds Round Table on Appeals Reform

On March 28, 2017, PVA participated in a widely attended round table sponsored by Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Subcommittee Chairman Mike Bost (R-IL) and Ranking Member Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) to discuss moving forward with plans developed over the last year to modernize the disability claims and appeals process. The legislation proposed during the last Congress reflected the work product of numerous veterans’ service organizations, organizations representing private attorneys practicing veterans’ law, and leadership from the Board of Veterans Appeals and the Veterans Benefits Administration. The legislation ultimately failed to secure passage due to a number of concerns, primarily related to the necessity of further discussions on how the new system would be implemented without hurting veterans who have current claims pending. A renewed effort by stakeholders to push the legislation forward during this Congress is gaining traction, and a hearing on an updated version of the legislation is expected to take place in the coming months.

ACA Repeal and Replace Health Care Reform Effort Fails

In early March, the House of Representatives took up legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and replace it with the American Health Care Act (AHCA). While portrayed as an effort to reduce health care costs for American consumers, the bill also proposed major changes to the Medicaid program through per capita caps and block grants and to repeal many provisions of the ACA that are critical to people with disabilities. In addition, the AHCA continued several problematic policies for veterans left over from the last effort to reform the health care system and created a potential roadblock for veterans to take advantage of tax credits offered in that measure.

The AHCA included cuts in Medicaid of some $880 billion along with caps on federal spending for the program. In return for greater flexibility for designing their own Medicaid programs, states would have received a lump sum—either in the form of block grants or a per capita spending formula—to provide services to their residents. Under the cap and cut proposal, the federal government would no longer share in the costs of providing health care services and community services beyond the capped amount. This would eliminate the enhanced federal match for the Community First Choice Option under Medicaid that provides attendant care services in the community. Thanks to this program, many poor veterans with serious nonservice-connected disabilities have been able to move from nursing homes into their communities. The AHCA would also have ended the ACA Medicaid expansion at a date earlier than current law. Data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation shows that the Medicaid expansion has helped thousands of veterans and caregivers obtain affordable health insurance coverage.

During its time under consideration in the House, the AHCA went through a number of changes in an effort by the leadership to garner sufficient votes to ensure its passage. However, each successive version made the bill even more challenging for people with pre-existing health conditions.

  • Loss of essential health benefits: One proposed change was to give states the option to waive important consumer protections in current law. For example, states could choose to ignore the essential health benefits rules that ensure that health plans cover basic services, many of which are particularly important to people with disabilities. Without a requirement that basic services be included in health insurance plans, insurers are likely to drop coverage of therapies or medications that support people with more health care needs.
  • No more protections for pre-existing conditions: Another troubling change being discussed was to let states waive the requirement for community rating. This would allow insurance companies to charge people with pre-existing conditions – including people with disabilities — whatever they wanted, essentially making any pre-existing condition protections meaningless. The combination of these changes would make it nearly impossible for people with pre-existing conditions to find affordable plans that cover basic health care services.

For veterans and PVA members in particular, the AHCA would have continued several problematic policies of the ACA as well as troubling new provisions that could affect the ability of many veterans to afford health insurance in the private market. The AHCA:

  • Continued to exclude CHAMPVA beneficiaries—dependents of the most catastrophically disabled veterans—from the dependents’ coverage policy up to age 26.
  • Failed to remove the prohibition on enrollment into the VA health care system for Priority Group 8 veterans, thus denying these veterans access to the principal health care system for veterans.
  • Denied access to tax credits making health insurance affordable to anyone eligible for a host of other federal health programs, including those “eligible” for coverage under Title 38 health care programs. This would prevent many veterans who may be “eligible for” but not enrolled in the VA health care system from accessing these tax credits intended to help people buy insurance.

On March 24, 2017, House Speaker Paul Ryan declared that there were not enough votes for the bill to pass the House of Representatives and the bill was pulled from the calendar. Nevertheless, discussions have continued between the Congressional leadership and the White House to craft a version of the AHCA that will be acceptable to a majority of Republicans in the House and Senate. PVA plans to continue monitoring developments in the health care reform debate to ensure that veterans and people with disabilities are not harmed by changes to vital health care programs on which they depend.

Update on the ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017

The “ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017,” H.R. 620, continues to gain co-sponsors. PVA opposes this legislation because it would limit the ability of people with disabilities to enforce their rights under Title III of the ADA. It was introduced by Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX). Original co-sponsors include Rep. Scott Peters (D-CA), Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA), Rep. Ami Bera (D-CA), Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), and Rep. Michael Conaway (R-TX).

H.R. 620 has gained nine additional co-sponsors since it was introduced on January 24th:

  • Representative Pete Aguilar (D-CA)
  • Representative Ralph Lee Abraham (R-LA)
  • Representative J. Luis Correa (D-CA)
  • Representative Doug Collins (R-GA)
  • Representative Bill Foster (D-IL)
  • Representative Jeff Denham (R-CA)
  • Representative Krysten Sinema (D-AZ)
  • Representative Paul Mitchell (R-MI)
  • Representative Darrell E. Issa (R-CA)

Please contact your Representatives to let them know that PVA opposes this legislation because it would require a person with a disability to send a letter of notification to the business that it was out of compliance with the law giving it a grace period before one could file suit. Instead of complying with the law now, businesses (large and small) could employ a “wait and see” approach, continuing to violate the law with impunity. Instead, businesses should be proactive in complying with the ADA and work with the ADA National Network and other entities for any needed technical assistance.

The bill is pending before the House Judiciary Committee and may be marked up by the full committee in the coming weeks.

The “Social Security 2100 Act” Reintroduced

On April 5, 2017, PVA Senior Associate Advocacy Director Susan Prokop joined Members of Congress, disability advocates and representatives of the aging community at a Capitol Hill roll out of H.R. 1920, the “Social Security 2100 Act,” introduced by Rep. John Larson (D-CT). Rep. Larson is Ranking Minority Member on the House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee. Citing polling data that shows 72 percent of Americans believe that Social Security benefits should be increased, not cut, Rep. Larson described provisions in his bill favored by 7 out of 10 Americans. Among those provisions are:

  • Adoption of the CPI-E for inflation increases: Using the CPI-E for the annual Social Security cost of living adjustment (COLA) would better reflect the costs incurred by seniors and people with disabilities who spend a greater portion of their income on health care, utilities and other necessities.
  • Protections for low income workers: To ensure that low income working people who pay into the system over a lifetime don’t retire into poverty, the bill establishes a new minimum benefit set at 25 percent above the poverty line.
  • Adjustments in the payroll tax wage base to help finance the system: Presently, payroll taxes are not collected on annual wages over $127,000. H.R. 1902 would apply the payroll tax to wages above $400,000 which would affect the top 0.4 percent of wage earners.
  • A gradual increase over 20 years in the payroll contribution rate to keep the system solvent: Beginning in 2018, FICA taxes would rise 0.05 percent annually so that workers and employers would pay an additional 1.2 percent by 2041. For the average worker this would mean paying an additional 50 cents per week to ensure the system’s longevity.

In addition, HR 1902 would provide a modest increase in benefits for all beneficiaries equivalent to 2 percent of the average benefit, cut taxes for upper income beneficiaries by raising the thresholds at which benefits are taxed to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for couples and combine the old age and survivors and disability insurance trust funds to foreclose future arguments over the disability insurance program by eliminating the artificial separation of the trust funds.

PVA supports H.R. 1902 because of its more realistic cost-of-living-adjustment for beneficiaries, enhanced protections for low income workers, and long overdue adjustments in the financing mechanisms for the system. Indeed, an independent analysis by the Social Security Administration’s Chief Actuary indicates that this legislation will extend the financial health of the system beyond the next 75 years. PVA believes this legislation demonstrates that preserving and strengthening Social Security can be done without causing harm to beneficiaries.

U.S. Access Board Issues Guidance on the International Symbol

of Accessibility

The U.S. Access Board has released guidance on the International Symbol of Accessibility (ISA) to address questions that have arisen on the use of alternative symbols. Some cities and states have adopted a different symbol that was created to be more dynamic and suggestive of movement. The Board’s guidance explains how use of a symbol other than the ISA impacts compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Standards issued under the ADA require that the ISA label certain accessible elements, spaces, and vehicles, including parking spaces, entrances, restrooms, and rail cars. Similar requirements are contained in standards issued under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) for federally funded facilities. The ISA, which is maintained by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), has served as a world-wide accessibility icon for almost 50 years.

“Consistency in the use of universal symbols is important, especially for persons with limited vision or cognitive disabilities,” states Marsha Mazz, Director of the Board’s Office of Technical and Information Services. “In addition to the ADA and ABA Standards, many codes and regulations in the U.S. and abroad also require display of the ISA.”

While the ADA Standards do not recognize specific substitutes for the ISA, they do generally allow alternatives to prescribed requirements that provide substantially equivalent or greater accessibility and usability under a provision known as “equivalent facilitation.” However, in the event of a legal challenge, the entity pursuing an alternative has the burden of proof in demonstrating equivalent facilitation. Under the ABA Standards, use of a symbol other than the ISA requires issuance of a modification or waiver by the appropriate standard-setting agency.

The ISA bulletin is posted on the Board’s website along with other issued guidance on the ADA Standards and the ABA Standards.




October Washington Update

October 18, 2016 Volume 22, No. 10


The Government Relations staff is still looking for stories about problems that our members have experienced during air travel. Please visit http://www.AirAccess30.org and share your story.

Congress Approves CR, Includes PVA Priorities

Prior to recessing for the November election at the end of September, Congress approved H.R. 5325, the “Continuing Appropriations and Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act for FY 2017,” that included full-year funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The bill contains three very important priorities for PVA. These include:

1. Reinstatement of the annual capacity reporting requirement. While a date for implementation has not been established, this is an important accomplishment that will bolster the work done by the PVA Medical Services site visit teams.
2. Authorization of the provision of reproductive services through VA, to include in vitro fertilization (IVF). This has long been a high priority for PVA. For the first time, veterans with service-connected catastrophic disabilities that preclude them from having children will have access to reproductive services through the VA. Unfortunately, we will have to defeat an amendment included in the Labor/HHS Appropriations bill, introduced by Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), that risks undermining the authority to provide IVF services both at VA as well as the Department of Defense.
3. Beneficiary travel for “some” non-service connected catastrophically disabled veterans, including those with SCI, blindness and amputation. The language in the bill states that it can be provided to those who travel to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, such as an SCI center, and are admitted for overnight stay or provided temporary lodging. Assuming appropriate interpretation, this should at least open the opportunity for beneficiary travel for PVA members receiving annual physicals; however, we do not believe it authorizes beneficiary travel for non-service connected veterans for same-day appointments. Additionally, it remains to be seen when this benefit will actually go into effect. We will obviously have to track implementation of this closely.

Sarah Dean, PVA Associate Legislative Director, deserves a great deal of credit for her tireless work on the capacity reporting issue and the IVF provisions specifically. Hard work remains to ensure that proper implementation of these important provisions occurs. This will be particularly true of the capacity report and the beneficiary travel provisions, which I anticipate VA will be resistant to acting on.

Legislation Stalled in the Senate

While key provisions were included in the CR, the lack of compromise generally led to a number of important pieces of legislation being left unfinished. Perhaps the biggest issue that has yet to be resolved is the appeals reform included in H.R. 5620, the “Accountability First and Appeals Reform Act,” introduced by House VA Committee Chairman Jeff Miller (R-FL). That legislation also included strong accountability measures for VA staff. The legislation passed the House in September with strong bipartisan support, but it is being held up in the Senate, primarily over disagreements on the accountability provisions.

Our work also continues on H.R. 3471, the “Veterans Mobility Safety Act.” While we were able to get it passed in the Senate, there has been continued resistance in the Senate. However, Gabe Stultz, Associate Legislative Director, has worked closely with Senator Jerry Moran’s (R-KS) office and they are prepared to move an amended version of H.R. 3471 that will satisfy all interested parties when Congress returns after the election.

Finally, the Senate has been unable to advance S. 2921, the “Veterans First Act.” Of highest importance to PVA in that legislation is provisions that will expand access to the Comprehensive Family Caregiver program to veterans of all eras, not just those injured after September 11, 2001. Unfortunately, cost remains a hurdle to advancing that effort. Additionally, provisions that are generally perceived to water down accountability, per the request of the government unions, have led a stalemate over the bill.

We anticipate a lot of focus on appeals reform and accountability when Congress returns for a lame duck session after the election in November.

DOT ACCESS Committee Completes Work

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Advisory Committee on Accessible Air Transportation (ACCESS Committee) completed its business on Friday, October 14, 2016. The 25 member Committee was charged with negotiating in good faith to reach consensus on a proposed rule addressing inflight entertainment, service animals, and accessible lavatories on single aisle aircraft. The department intends to use the consensus agreement from the ACCESS Committee as the basis for a proposed rule. After six months’ worth of work, there were varying degrees of success. The Committee focused on three key areas—lavatories, service animals, and inflight entertainment. The following is a review of that work.


The Committee reached consensus that all new aircraft of a certain size shall have accessible lavatories by a certain date. Recognizing that a prior committee failed in this process in 1993 and that there is expense to the industry in complying, the Committee adopted a two tiered approach in providing accessible lavatories on new single aisle aircraft.

The first tier includes all new aircraft delivered three years after the effective date of the final rule. The second tier includes aircraft that are ordered 18 years and delivered 20 or more years after the effective date of the final rule; or are a new type design for which application is filed with the FAA or a foreign carrier civil aviation authority more than 1 year after the effective date of the final rule. Both tiers have multiple levels of access for passengers with disabilities. Access that begins in the first tier carries over into the second tier of accessibility.

Specifically, the first tier applies to all carriers operating aircraft that have FAA-certified maximum passenger capacity of 60 or more seats. This will include flight attendant training on an annual basis to proficiency in use of the new DOT onboard wheelchair and assembly or modifications to the accessible features of the lavatory. Carriers must also provide information upon request to passengers with disability concerning the accessible features of the lavatory including controls and dispensers and the information must be on the carrier’s website, in electronic or printed forms with picture diagrams, on the aircraft. Carrier will also remove the international symbol of accessibility (ISA) from all lavatories new and in service that cannot facilitate an independent seated transfer.

All first and second tier aircraft with FAA-certified maximum passenger capacity of 125 or more seats will have at least one lavatory that meets the following specifications. The aircraft shall have a standard toilet seat height ranging from 17-19 inches high, assist handles that support 250 pounds and an array of controls and dispensers that are tactilely accessible and measured for a performance specification that meets the definition of a person with a disability in a seated position. These interior lavatory components include: attendant call buttons, door lock, flush control, faucet controls, paper towel and soap dispensers, and trash and bio waste units. All components where reasonably available in supplier catalogs shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist.

Other features that will apply to a first tier aircraft include a visual barrier that shall be available upon request. It will provide passengers with disabilities using the lavatory (with the door possibly open) a level of privacy substantially equivalent to that provided to ambulatory users. Most importantly is a door sill or threshold that provides minimum obstruction to the passage of the on board wheelchair across the sill while preventing leakage of fluid or causing a tripping hazard during evacuation. The door sill threshold applies to both tiers of access.

New covered single aisle aircraft with FAA-certified maximum passenger capacity of 125 or more seats entering service three years after the effective date of the final rule must have onboard wheelchairs that meet new standards to be developed by DOT. DOT will consult with advocates, airlines, wheelchair manufacturers, flight attendants and other stake holders in developing these standards. The purpose of the onboard wheelchair standards is to improve the safety of traditional models of onboard wheelchairs and develop, if feasible, specifications for an over-the-toilet onboard wheelchair design. The target date to complete the onboard wheelchair standards is February 2017.
Second tier aircraft with FAA-certified maximum passenger capacity of 125 or more seats in which lavatories are provided will be required to have one lavatory of sufficient size / design to permit a passenger with a disability to perform a seated independent and dependent transfer from the onboard wheelchair to and from the toilet within a closed space that affords to persons using the onboard wheelchair privacy equal to that afforded by ambulatory passengers. To ensure these new lavatories meet the performance specifications they will be designed/modeled with the 95 percent male (6’2, 246lbs) and 5 percent female (4’11,125lbs) range to meet the required transfers, including the use of a 95 percent male to assist a dependent 95 percent male with a transfer from the onboard wheelchair to and from to toilet within the closed lavatory space.

The committee reached a consensus vote of 17 for the agreement, 1 no vote and 3 abstentions. PVA supported this agreement as first tier accessibility will provide increased access to lavatories in the short-term and ensure full-access at a time-certain in the future.

Service Animals

Despite good faith negotiations, the ACCESS Committee reached an impasse in its efforts to come to a consensus on revising the definition of a service animal and the requirements for access for those animals under the ACAA.

The impasse resulted due to an inability to find a suitable alternative to current regulations which allow airlines to request as a condition of access that users of psychiatric and emotional support animals provide current documentation from a mental health professional stating that they have a mental or emotional disability for which they need the animal. Airlines and advocates considered imposition of a requirement for all service animal and emotional support animal users to complete an attestation confirming that they were a person with a disability and that the animal was needed either in flight or at the destination due to the disability. The proposed attestation would also have alerted the individual to the possibility that attempting to pass a pet as a service animal or emotional support animal could result in penalties. Ultimately, we were unable to find a solution that would free psychiatric and emotional support animal users from the burdens of medical documentation without imposing new, unacceptable burdens on all service animal users.

Another issue that remains unresolved is the types of species of service animals that should be allowed under the ACAA. Currently, domestic carriers are never required to permit access for unusual service animals such as snakes, rodents, and spiders, but must otherwise permit access for service animals unless the carrier determines that there are factors that preclude the animal from traveling in the cabin. Foreign carriers do not have to provide access to service animal species other than dogs. Stakeholders generally agreed that dogs, miniature horses, and capuchin monkeys should be classified as service animals. An unresolved question remained whether cats should also be included.
In addition, stakeholders were unable to resolve whether emotional support animals should continue to have access. Under the ACAA, the definition of service animal includes emotional supports animals. Stakeholders considered removing emotional support animals from the definition and reclassifying those and other similar animals as “support animals.” Species considered for support animals included dogs, cats, and rabbits. Those animals would have had more limited access than service animals as in many cases they would have been required to travel in a pet-carrier but still able to perform disability mitigation, if needed.

In light of the failure of these negotiations to reach consensus, DOT will now be charged with developing a proposed rule on this issue. The efforts of disability advocates, including PVA, have provided DOT with significant insight. We look forward to weighing in with DOT to ensure that any proposed rule preserves the access rights of all service animal users.

Inflight Entertainment

The ACCESS Committee still has work to do in trying to reach consensus on the issue of accessible inflight entertainment and communication. Currently, airlines are not providing captioning for the deaf or audio description for the blind on movies or television shows packaged by the airlines for inflight entertainment. The problem revolves around technical hardware and software mechanical issues of the seatback display systems that in service airplanes use. The work group on inflight entertainment and communication will meet November 2, 2016 to finish their negotiation in hopes of reaching a consensus.

The DOT Facilitators’ report is due in early December. The report will reflect the entire work of the ACCESS Committee in the three areas they were charged to reach agreement on and all public documents that were sent to the Committee in support of the issues. The DOT onboard wheelchair standards are due in February 2017 and the Department hopes to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register by the end of June 2017.

PVA Participates in Suicide Roundtable Discussion
On September 23, 2016, VA gathered a large group of veterans’ service organizations (VSOs) to discuss opportunities for collaboration and some of the salient issues with regard to confronting veteran suicide. The primary issues discussed related to both identifying at risk veterans and getting those veterans to engage in VA-provided services. An additional challenge is that even if veterans are identified, not all are eligible for care.

VA discussed briefly the mental health summits that it is holding throughout all VAMCs. The American Legion mentioned that many of their NSOs were not made aware of these summits, and the opportunity for VSOs to reach out to their local members was lost. VA will reevaluate its communications with VSOs for the summits, and they provided the upcoming schedule of all summits so that VSOs can alert their field offices.

VA also explained briefly some of their efforts to assist families of veterans who are contemplating suicide and community providers handling veteran patients contemplating suicide.

Ultimately, the forum was a chance for VA to ask PVA and our fellow VSOs as individual organizations to decide how we can partner with VA to reach veterans who are struggling. Suicide prevention materials being shared publicly by the VA can be viewed at the video links below:

• Newest Suicide Prevention PSA “Be There: Help Save a Life”: https://youtube/MCSZ7FjTq5I
• Suicide Prevention PSA “I’m good. But are you ready to listen?”: https://youtu.be/YPFo9EvUUvA
• Suicide Prevention PSA “The Power of 1”: https://youtu.be/WSx11Kmnmrg
• Veterans Crisis Line – After the Call: https://youtu.be/l8cQHTzZTIs

Deadline for Claims in Department of Justice’s Historic Settlement with Greyhound for ADA Violations Approaching

On February 8, 2016, the Department of Justice announced a consent decree resolving a complaint against Greyhound for alleged violations under the Americans with Disabilities (ADA). Allegations against Greyhound included failing to maintain accessibility features on buses, failing to provide assistance to passengers with disabilities, and failing to allow passengers using wheelchairs to complete reservations online. As a result of the consent decree, Greyhound will be required to compensate travelers with disabilities who experienced disability discrimination while traveling or attempting to travel on Greyhound.

The deadline for passengers with disabilities who encountered disability-related discrimination on Greyhound to submit a claim for compensation is November 10, 2016.
To be eligible for compensation, an individual must have a disability; have traveled or attempted to travel on Greyhound between February 8, 2013, and February 8, 2016; and have experienced a disability-related incident during travel or while attempting to travel. Examples of incidents include lack of accessible transportation and failure to make disability-related accommodations.

Individuals who believe they meet these requirements must submit a claim online, by email, or mail to Greyhound’s appointed claims administrator by November 10, 2016. Instructions regarding the claims process are available at: http://www.dojvgreyhoundsettlement.com. To contact the Claims Administrator, please call 1-844-502-5953 or by email at GRYsettlement@classactionadmin.com.

ADA Notification Act Legislation Introduced in the Senate

On September 28, 2016, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) introduced S. 3446, the “ADA Education and Reform Act of 2016.” This legislation would require a person with a disability to give notice to a public accommodation of an architectural barrier under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prior to filing a lawsuit. Sen. Flake’s legislation is a companion bill to H.R. 3765, which was introduced by Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) and passed by the House Judiciary Committee in July. Despite concerns that H.R. 3765 might be brought to the House floor for a vote in September, no further action on this legislation has occurred.
PVA strongly opposes proposed ADA notification requirements. Notification laws put the onus on the person with a disability to find ADA violations and notify a public accommodation of those violations. No other civil rights group is forced to shoulder the burden of triggering compliance with the law and, once they have done so, to wait to enforce their civil rights. Accessibility standards, such as those the ADA includes, are extremely important. Covered entities should continuously evaluate their businesses for appropriate access under the ADA and not wait to receive a notification before acting to make them fully accessible.

OFCCP Hosts Business Roundtable for National Disability Employment Awareness Month

On October 6, 2016, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) hosted a forum highlighting successful business strategies for outreach to and recruitment of people with disabilities into the nation’s workforce. OFCCP is the agency within the Department of Labor (DOL) responsible for enforcing government contractors’ compliance with Section 503 and VEVRAA. Those regulations require federal contractors to take affirmative steps to recruit and hire people with disabilities and certain targeted veterans, including those with disabilities. The roundtable was part of OFCCP’s observance of National Disability Employment Awareness Month and brought together representatives of companies that have excelled in making disability inclusion a vital part of their workforce diversity efforts.

In a keynote address, Robert J. O’Hara, Vice President with United Technologies Corp., expressed support for the regulations that require companies to document their progress in bringing more people with disabilities into their operations. He also described challenges they encountered in broadening their disability outreach including appropriate ways to encourage people to identify as someone with a disability and connecting with talent pipelines to find qualified applicants. Among the strategies that worked for UT and for others at the forum were participation in networking conferences sponsored by organizations such as U.S. Business Leadership Network and National Organization on Disability, creating partnerships with universities to reach students with disabilities, and involvement of top corporate leadership in disability inclusion efforts.

For more information about DOL initiatives undertaken for National Disability Employment Awareness Month go to https://www.dol.g

August Washington Update


August 19, 2016                                                               Volume 22, No. 8


The Government Relations staff is still looking for stories about problems that our members have experienced during air travel.  Please visit www.AirAccess30.org and share your story. 

Presidential Campaigns Wrap-up Nominating Conventions

The House and Senate recessed in mid-July to accommodate the Republican and Democratic National Conventions held over the last two weeks of July.  The Republican National Convention (RNC) was held the first week after recess in Cleveland, OH.  During the convention, Donald Trump and Mike Pence were formally nominated as the Republican candidates for the President and Vice President.  The Democratic National Convention (DNC) was held the following week in Philadelphia, PA.  During the DNC, Hillary Clinton and Senator Tim Kaine were formally nominated as the Democratic candidates for President and Vice President.

The conventions also included approval of the official party platforms for the Republican and Democratic parties.  Both platforms recommit to America’s sacred trust to veterans, they expound at length the heroic character of our service members, and regrettable consequences that befall them and their families.  Where their similarities diverge is in each party’s perception of primary problems and the corresponding plans to address them.  The full RNC platform can be accessed at:  https://gop.com/platform/.  The full DNC platform can be accessed at:  https://www.demconvention.com/platform/.

The RNC platform denounces the wait-time scandals concerning VA.  In response to these controversies, Republicans seek accountability of senior leadership and fundamental changes to their structure.  Regarding veterans’ health care, Republicans will seek to consolidate VA’s existing community care authorities to make a single program.  In order to combat bureaucratic stagnancy, they encourage VA partnerships with private enterprises, VSOs and competitive bidding, predicting such work will allow for high quality VA care, reduce backlogs, and save resources.  Additionally, Republicans will retain veterans’ preference, support a broader range of options for health care, including faith-based programs to respond to the opioid crisis, and encourage private sector and public school hiring of veterans.

The Democrats, equally enraged by VA scandals, propose fully resourcing VA to meet the needs of all veterans and reject attempts at privatization.  The platform emphasizes the need for more education benefits and job training, preservation of the post-9/11 GI Bill, and fair treatment of reservists and Guard members.  They recommit to ending chronic homelessness and suicide.  Regarding veterans’ health care, they emphasize veteran-centric care, resources for military sexual trauma (MST), the growth of mental health programs, treatment of invisible and toxic wounds and the expansion of the VA Caregiver Program to veterans of all eras. They seek to provide women with full and equal treatment, including reproductive health services. The DNC platform also proposes workplace policies that are more equitable for caregivers, as well as the expansion of a well-paid home care workforce and increased access to long-term care. They disfavor the deportation of immigrants who are veterans, while also highlighting the housing crisis for veterans in Indian Country.

The only identical policy proposal from both parties, aside from vaguely ensuring high quality health care and benefits for veterans (achieved differently), is a commitment to veterans treatment courts to prioritize rehabilitation over incarceration.

The respective platforms also offer views on some disability policy, albeit with slightly different inflections. The Republican platform highlighted the GOP’s historic support of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the role of Republican leadership in the enactment of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), ABLE Act and the Steve Gleason Act.  WIOA was the first major overhaul of the nation’s workforce system in almost 20 years while the ABLE Act was a measure that lets people with disabilities maintain access to services while saving to develop assets.  The Gleason law bears the name of former NFL player Steve Gleason who developed ALS.  The law provides access to speech-generating devices. To encourage entrepreneurship, the platform endorsed opening the Small Business Administration’s 8(a) certification program to people with disabilities, something that PVA has long supported.  The platform continued the party’s opposition to embryonic stem cell research and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.  Social Security was addressed largely from the perspective of reforms needed to the retirement system with Republicans calling for “all options,” other than tax increases, to be considered for modernizing this important social insurance program.

The Democratic platform addressed a number of issues important to individuals with disabilities including affirmation of support for the ADA and promises to expand access to appropriate accommodations and supports people with disabilities need to live in integrated community settings. The party endorsed policies that would bring to an end sub-minimum wage work, improve the lives of caregivers of people with disabilities, increase federal funding for affordable housing for low-income families, people with disabilities, veterans and the elderly, improve access to meaningful and gainful employment for people with disabilities and vowed to continue to fight for ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

In sections of the platform concerning restoration of the full protections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), the Democrats highlight support for full funding of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to ensure that all registration materials, voting materials, polling places, and voting machines are fully accessible to seniors and Americans with disabilities.  With regard to Social Security, the platform opposes efforts to cut or privatize the program or raise the retirement age and supports improvements to the cost-of-living formula that better reflects the fixed expenses of seniors and people with disabilities. The party also proposes measures to ensure the long term solvency of Social Security by asking those earning above $250,000, a year to contribute more to the system and to provide sufficient financial support to the Social Security Administration to ensure it can provide timely benefits and high quality services to all beneficiaries.

Ultimately, the platforms only serve as a guide for the two parties during the course of the political campaigns with the goal to influence the policy positions of the major party candidates.  However, the presidential candidates are not obligated to adopt the platform proposals.  During next month’s Washington Update, we will highlight the individual candidates’ policies directed towards veterans and people with disabilities.

PVA Attends VA Joint Symposium: Safeguarding the Integrity of GI Bill Benefit

On August 3, 2016, VA and the Deputy Under Secretary for Economic Opportunity, Curtis Coy, hosted a joint symposium to address VA’s enforcement of its consumer protection authorities to protect veterans from dishonest schools.  VA has faced considerable criticism for failing to take action against predatory for-profit colleges targeting veterans and service members.  Current law calls for VA to cease distribution of federal funds when it finds that a school is employing aggressive, deceptive or fraudulent recruiting practices in order to get access to the lucrative GI Bill and Defense Department Tuition Assistance.  So far, however, VA has taken relatively few enforcement steps despite numerous reports of deceptive behavior.

PVA and its VSO partners discussed the various legal authorities VA has at its disposal and advocated for greater enforcement efforts against such schools.  We also encouraged VA to develop a support structure for veterans who have already been harmed by these schools or are otherwise forced to try and transfer into a different school to continue their education.

PVA Conducts Survey to Support Access Committee Work

In May, PVA was notified that Lee Page, Senior Associate Advocacy Director, was selected to be a member of the Access Advisory Committee on Accessible Air Transportation overseen by the Department of Transportation (DOT).  The Committee is comprised of representatives from the disability community as well as the airline industry.  During its first meeting, the ACCESS Committee selected PVA to chair the workgroup evaluating the need for accessible lavatories on board aircraft.

In order to assist the ACCESS Committee, PVA recently conducted a survey/poll to disability stakeholders addressing seven questions that gauge their expectations for an accessible lavatory on a new single aisle aircraft. The poll was conducted over a three week period, with final results being collected on August 1, 2016. During that time period, 931 total respondents and 515 PVA members registered their opinions.  We were particularly pleased with the response rate—8 percent—to the survey (industry standards consider 3 percent response rate to any survey to be good).

The overall results show that current lavatories are too small and more space is needed. The other significant take away was the lack of ability to get to the lavatory.  Many respondents indicated that they were not aware of on board wheelchairs and had trouble getting the assistance needed to obtain them or their personal assistive devices.  Additionally, airline personnel need more training in order to assist passengers throughout the process.

Review of AirAccess30.org Website

With the www.AirAccess30.org website now having been live for six months, we have analyzed visitor traffic on the site.  In the first six months, there have been approximately 3,200 total visits to the website and approximately 2,700, unique visits.  While visits to the website decreased during April and May, there was a significant increase in June and July.  Some of this can be attributed to more awareness from PVA members as they traveled to our Annual Convention in May and to the significant number of athletes who traveled to the National Veterans’ Wheelchair Games in June and July.  Additionally, the time spent on the website during each visit increased significantly during June and July.  The website currently includes 39 individual stories with additional stories that will be posted soon.  We will continue to promote the website widely leading up to the 30th anniversary of the Air Carrier Access Act signing in October and carrying into the new Congress next year.

Election Assistance Commission Focused on Security for Elections

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was established by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in 2002.  The EAC is an independent, bipartisan commission charged with developing guidance to meet HAVA requirements, adopting voluntary voting system guidelines, and serving as a national clearinghouse of information on election administration.  The EAC is currently working with all levels of government to facilitate the conversation regarding securing the election process and to support election officials’ efforts to provide an accessible and secure voting process. Since the creation of its Voting System Testing and Certification Program, in partnership with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the EAC has led in ensuring voting systems brought to the market have been vigorously tested against security standards.  Voting systems certified by the EAC are not connected to the Internet. Further, the EAC has worked with local and state election officials—as well as election stakeholders, from accessibility experts to scientists and academics—to ensure that best practices are shared nationwide.  These best practices include pre-election testing, security, continuity planning, and post-election audits.  Already this year, the EAC has conducted a series of events related to the #BeReady16 initiative, and more are underway and planned, including activities addressing Election Security Preparedness. Voters are encouraged to get involved with their state and local election officials, and ask questions about their election process. The vast majority of election offices offer numerous opportunities for voters to engage in the process, including witnessing pre-election testing of the voting systems.  Election officials welcome voters’ questions and

participation because they want voters to have confidence and to participate in the process. The EAC also encourages voters to work at the polls as election workers. The election process benefits from full engagement from all people, and election administrators across the country are seeking election workers now for November.  With 50 days before the deadline to mail ballots to military and overseas voters, the EAC is working with all stakeholders to lead discussions productively so that voters can have the utmost confidence in the election process.

For more questions about accessible voting, contact PVA Senior Associate Advocacy Director Lee Page.

Washington Updates – February

February 21, 2014                                                       Volume 20,   No. 2

 Major Veterans Legislation Introduced in the Senate
In January, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs introduced one of the most comprehensive veterans bills to ever be considered in the Senate or House—S. 1982 (originally introduced as S. 1950), the “Comprehensive Veterans Health and Benefits and Military Retirement Pay Restoration Act of 2014.” If enacted, S. 1982 would accomplish some of the highest priorities for Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) and its members.

This comprehensive bill would create, expand, advance, and extend a wide array of VA health care and benefits services and programs that are important to PVA and its members. Specifically, this legislation provides for the expansion of the Comprehensive Caregiver Assistance Program to veterans of all eras (not just those injured after September 11, 2001). This change represents one of the single biggest priorities for PVA.

The legislation also addresses another high priority for PVA. Specifically, the bill provides advance appropriations authority for VA’s mandatory funding accounts (compensation and pension, education benefits, dependency and indemnity compensation, etc.) to ensure that in the event of a future government shutdown, veterans’ benefits payments would not be delayed or put in jeopardy. The need for this change was revealed during the partial government shutdown that occurred in October 2013.

Another high priority for PVA that this legislation addresses is repeal of the reduction in future cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for all military retirees, not just service members who are retired due to disability. The Senate and House shamefully approved a one percent reduction in the COLA for military retirees as a part of the Bipartisan Budget Agreement in December 2013. Currently, it appears that the House and Senate may approve stand-alone legislation to repeal the COLA reduction for all military retirees.

Additionally, the legislation opens the VA health care system up to any veteran who wishes to enroll for care instead of entering into a health care exchange under the provisions of the Affordable Care Act. Additionally, it sets up a mechanism to expand access to dental care for all veterans.

Following a major grassroots effort from the veterans’ service organization (VSO) community to build support for S. 1982, PVA along with many of its VSO partners joined Senator Sanders for a press conference to encourage bipartisan support for the measure. As a part of the press conference, PVA emphasized the importance of the provision to expand the Comprehensive Caregiver Support Program to benefit veterans of all eras.

Subsequent to the introduction of the legislation, Senator John Boozman (R-AR) and Senate Mark Begich (D-AK) offered an amendment to S. 1982 that would make all the programs of the VA advance appropriations, including the discretionary accounts (with the exception of VA health care that is already advance appropriated). PVA strongly supports the Boozman-Begich amendment.

House Veterans Affairs’ Subcommittee Examines VBA Transformation
On February 5, Representative Jon Runyan (R-NJ), Chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs conducted a hearing to review the current status and secondary effects of the Veterans Benefits Administration’s (VBA) technology initiatives. PVA submitted a formal statement for the record for the hearing. Representatives from the veterans service organization community as well as the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Defense Health Agency testified at the hearing.

The hearing focused on a number of issues; however, Chairman Runyan indicated that his primary reason for holding the hearing was because of his interest in improving the efficiencies of the VA benefits systems by streamlining and simplifying services to veterans, their families and survivors. The Chairman indicated he was eager to work with VA to implement reasonable changes and said he was optimistic that many of the actions VA has employed to date have made a positive change. However, he cautioned VA that as they strive to achieve the 125 day goal for claims in 2015, they must not prioritize an “appearance” of success over actual quantitative improvement. Ranking Minority Member Dina Titus (D-NV) echoed the Chairman’s points, remarking that last fiscal year VA completed a record 1.7 million claims, reduced the time veterans had to wait for their claims, and cut the claims backlog by 35 percent. She also thanked the stakeholders present at the hearing for their help in reducing the backlog as well through their efforts and advice to veterans seeking benefits.

PVA outlined a number of concerns in our statement. One particular concern is VA’s recent plan that they have outlined would require electronic forms submission when filing an initial claim. This plan, if enacted, would significantly disadvantage veterans in seeking their earned benefits. If a veteran doesn’t express his intention to secure a benefit on the right form, he or she won’t be recognized as having made a claim. The burden is on the veteran and VA’s duty to assist will be seriously diluted, potentially interfering with a veteran’s access to their rightful benefit. This is a path that PVA is unwilling to endorse.

Additionally, PVA’s major concern at this point is the ability of VBA employees to effectively comprehend and implement the new transformation initiatives as these new programs are rolled out. VA employees are conscientious, hard working individuals; but the ongoing changes have been a challenge for the workforce. PVA has often testified on the lack of good training programs by VA that provide adjudicators with the base of knowledge needed for the complicated job of claims processing. With all the changes going on, there often seems to be difficulty in getting the new policies, procedures or processes down to the lowest staff level. We believe this trend continues despite the transformation.

The changes to VBA systems have been good. However, if the changes are not closely monitored and sufficient time is not taken to ensure the changes are implemented correctly, it could easily lead to greater inaccuracy at the expense of the veteran. As the Chairman implied in his opening statement, numbers success is not the goal for VA; proper services for the veteran, their family and survivors is the true measure of success. PVA will continue to closely monitor VA’s efforts to ensure this remains the goal. To read PVA’s full statement, please visit www.pva.org.

House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Holds Hearing on VA Accountability and Surgical Implants

On January 15, 2014, the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, held a hearing titled, “Vendors in the Operating Room—VA’s Failed Oversight of Surgical Implants.” The purpose of the hearing was to assess the Department of Veterans’ Affairs’ (VA) ability to manage the procurement of surgical implants for veterans. The Subcommittee focused on the findings of a recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation of VA policies involving patient safety and surgical implants purchases within VA medical facilities.

Surgical implants purchased by the VA include items such as artificial joints, cardiac pacemakers, and biological implants. During the hearing, the GAO testified that “…VA surgical implant purchase requirements were not always followed at selected VA medical centers, and VA oversight needs improvement.” The GAO further stated that this lack of compliance decreases the VA’s ability to determine if surgical implant purchases are “fair and reasonable.” The investigation also found that VA’s current management system does not have an adequate system to monitor and locate veterans with surgical implants. This finding was of particular concern to the Subcommittee as it has the potential to lead to safety issues for veterans if a surgical implant is recalled. The VA testified that it is updating its policy for the procurement of surgical implants (prosthetics) to ensure consistent administration of purchase procedures and better manage the use of surgical implants. The Subcommittee also called into question the VA’s policy that allows vendors selling surgical implants to be present in VA operating rooms, physically providing care to veterans. The VA testified that while it is accepted practice for vendors to be present in “clinical care settings,” it is VA policy that vendors are only present with the consent of veterans and are not to physically interact with veterans and their care.

The Subcommittee strongly urged the VA to strengthen and strictly enforce patient safety guidelines for prosthetic vendors and its medical centers. The VA stated that it is working to improve patient safety, and will continue to review the findings of the GAO investigation.

The FY 2015 Independent Budget Released

The FY 2015 Independent Budget (IB)was released on February 2, 2014, in advance of the Administrations FY 2015 projected budget for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This year marks the 28th year that the document has been co-authored by the American Veterans (AMVETS), Disabled American Veterans (DAV), Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA), and the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States (VFW). The IB is published annually as a comprehensive budget and policy document to inform VA leadership and policy makers of veterans’ health care and benefits needs.

For FY 2015, the IB recommends that Congress provide a total of $72.9 billion for veterans’ VA health care and benefits services. In addition to the VA budget recommendation, the document is comprised of five sections that address policy issues involving VA services—Benefits, Medical Care, Construction, Employment and Education, and the National Cemetery Administration. Issues of particular concern to the IB co-authors this year include the underfunding of VA construction accounts, continued reduction of the benefits claims backlog, and expanding advanced appropriations to all VA discretionary and mandatory appropriations accounts. After the Administration proposes a FY 2015 budget, the IB co-authors will testify before Congress to address these issues.

The IB is a highly regarded document that is utilized by members of Congress and federal leaders to determine ways to better serve veterans. More than 50 organizations are listed as endorsers of this year’s IB in support of improving VA services for veterans.

The Independent Budget is available online at www.independentbudget.org.

New VEVRAA and Section 503 Rules Spur Federal Contractor Outreach
In late January, Advocacy staff participated in a conference organized by representatives of the federal contractor community to educate companies doing business with the federal government about new regulations governing recruitment and hiring of veterans and people with disabilities. On March 24, 2014, new rules issued by the Department of Labor Office Of Federal Contract Compliance Programs [OFCCP] go into effect calling for greater accountability by federal contractors in following requirements under the Vietnam Era Veterans Re-adjustment Act [VEVRAA] and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act.

VEVRAA, which actually covers veterans beyond the Vietnam era, requires contractors and subcontractors with a federal contract or subcontract in the amount of $100,000 to take affirmative steps to employ and advance certain qualified covered veterans. These classes of veterans include those with service-connected disabilities, recently separated veterans (veterans within 3 years of their discharge or release from active duty), veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized and Armed Forces service medal veterans. To meet the benchmarks set out under the new VEVRAA rules, OFCCP has projected that federal contractors would need to hire an additional 205,500 veterans in these categories.

Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act places nondiscrimination and general affirmative action requirements for qualified people with disabilities on government contractors with contracts or subcontracts in excess of $10,000. OFCCP has estimated that, to meet the goals set out for Section 503, federal contractors will have to hire an additional 594,580 individuals with disabilities, 84,490 of which would be protected veterans with disabilities.

One panel at this OFCCP Institute focused on best practices for contractors to following in recruiting individuals and veterans with disabilities. Advocacy staff highlighted PVA’s Operation PAVE and its successes in placing veterans with the most significant barriers to employment. Other panelists described the key elements of corporate culture that foster a diverse talent pool and outreach efforts to veterans undertaken by one major federal contractor, Lockheed Martin.

The second day of the Institute featured a job fair for veterans and their families from around the Washington, DC area. Staff from PVA’s Operation PAVE took part in this program offering advice and guidance on resume writing, job search techniques and the services provided through the vocational rehabilitation program.

ADA Live – Voting Accessibility
“ADA Live!” is a monthly radio show broadcast free on the Internet. Ask questions and learn about your rights and responsibilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The next episode is “Voting Accessibility”. In 2002, President George W. Bush signed into law the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). This legislation is aimed at improving the general election process and sets forth new requirements for state election officials to follow. This episode will explain HAVA and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and discuss the requirement to make polling places across the United States accessible to people with disabilities. The show will also discuss accessible registration, effective communication, voting aids and accessible polling places for people with disabilities.

ADA Live – Voting Accessibility
March 5
1:00 pm to 1:30 pm
Listen here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wada-se
Live captioning here: http://adalive.org/captioning
Check out the archive of past episodes here: http://adalive.org/schedule
For questions or more information, contact the Southeast ADA Center here: http://adalive.org/contact